Weitere Suchvorschläge:

Amazon Amazon | hms sestetto digital (16) | hans deutsch dell (24) | hans deutsch atl 308 (45) | hans deutsch atl 312 (53) | hans deutsch style (59) | hans deutsch atl 310 (63) |

Brazilian Original SounDigital 3000.1D Nano 2 ohms Nano Digital Amplifier Module

Ende: 08.06. 2023 13:08:11 am Donnerstag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 249.94 CHF FESTPREIS
  • Status: 30T 21:28:9
  • Artikelnummer: 204330401935
  • Verkäufer: (|%)
  • Verkäufertyp:
  • Ort: Brasilien Brasilien
  • Versand nach:
  • Versandkosten: 22,32 CHF
  • bei ebay

Brazilian Original SounDigital 3000.1D Nano 2 ohms Nano Digital Amplifier Module

Ende: 06.06. 2023 20:35:08 am Dienstag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 254.4 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: 29T 23:25:49
  • Artikelnummer: 204328595361
  • Verkäufer: (|%)
  • Verkäufertyp:
  • Ort: Brésil Brasilien
  • Versand nach:
  • Versandkosten: 22,71 EUR
  • bei ebay

OCC 75 Ohms HiFi Audio Coaxial Cable Sliver Plated Audio Signal Digital Cable

Ende: 06.06. 2023 13:18:36 am Dienstag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 11.57 EUR Auktion
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 354818008019
  • Anzahl Gebote: 0
  • Verkäufer: info666 (293|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Gewerblich (mit Basis Shop)
  • Ort: shenzhen China
  • Versand nach: Worldwide
  • Versandkosten: 0,0 EUR
  • bei ebay

QED DAV Professional Digital SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable 1.5m RCA-RCA New

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:34 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 33.71 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 145096906773
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1023|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 3,0 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    QED DAV FLX1 solid core oxygen free copper cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm RCA plug, gold plated contacts. Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This is a bargain priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to RCA cable, and can be made in any length. (up to a recommended maximum of 5m). This cable is unusual in that most RCAs plugs are not 75 Ohm, so no matter how good the cable, the plugs will cause reflections of the high frequency digital signal and cause increased risk of timing errors (jitter). These plugs designed originally for 75 Ohm use in component video and RF applications are a perfect fit for the QED cable and ironically perform better than any of the QED plugs on this cable. Background Q: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever?A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late!Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTIONIn the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help? Jitter The phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. Interference Finally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Length of cable – why 1.5m? Summary There are only two occasions in audio where a longer cable – or an optimum length cable is better than a short one. Digital cables have an optimum length of 1.5m or more. (The other occasion is for MM phono cartridges, which need a specific capacitance). The reason for this requires an explanation. Please refer to the diagram in the photos. The signal travelling down a SPDIF (so-called digital cable) is actually a square wave ANALOGUE voltage signal; however, in reality, this square does not have instantaneous changes - the squares are sloped and somewhat rounded off, too, as it takes some time to change state from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0. The accuracy of the pulses at the end of the cable determines how accurately the source can interpret the signal in value 1 or 0 and also timing which is not so easy. The signal reflects back off the ends of the cable, the plugs and connected equipment (echoing back and forth). It produces ghost images of itself, which can fool the receiver into thinking that the ghost signals are the original signals. With short cables, under 1m, the ghost signals arrive close to the originals within the transition time frame from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 before the transition occurs. A 1m cable means the reflection arrives at about the same time as the transition is to be recorded. With longer cables, the reflection arrives too late to influence the receiver (The transition has already been recorded). Longer cables also mean lower amplitude or signal reflection; thus receiver can more easily determine between the correct signal and the spurious reflections. The bottom line is that a longer cable eliminates the false readings from the ghost images and thus reduces timing errors, called jitter, and therefore sounds better. Measurements and experimentation have determined the optimum size to be 1.5m or more. Very detailed explanation- for the curious, accompanies the diagram in the photos. Why SPDIF cables should be 1.5m long, detailed explanation. When the SPDIF signal is launched into the cable from the Transport, it is essentially a voltage square wave, consisting of rising and falling edges. These edges are no more than voltage transitions from about –250mV to +250mV, the rising edge transitioning from minus voltage to plus voltage and the falling edge transitioning from plus voltage to minus voltage. When an edge transitions, it can be described as having a rise-time or fall-time. This is the time it takes for the signal to transition from 10% to 90% of the entire voltage swing. (Note that this DOES Not happen instantaneously). The rise-time is important because this is what causes reflections on the transmission line. If the rise-time were very, very slow, say 50 nanoseconds, then there would be no reflections on the transmission line unless it was extremely long. Alternately, if the rise-time were less than one nanosecond, reflections would occur at every boundary, such as the connection from the circuit board to the wires that go to the connector. Typical stock Transports have around 25 nanosecond rise times. The primary concern for the manufacturer is to pass FCC regulations for emissions and electromagnetic interference and make the interface reliable. When the regulatory testing is done, they attach inexpensive, inferior cables and measure the emissions. To ensure that the manufacturer passes these tests, they take several precautions. One is designing in the slower than necessary 25 nanosecond rise-time. Another is inserting various filters in the Transport to eliminate high frequencies from the signal. As a result of these choices, there is a hazard created in using too short a digital cable. It is a result of the slow rise-time. When a transition is launched into the cable, it takes a period of time to propagate or transit to the other end. This propagation time is somewhat slower than the speed of light, usually around two nanoseconds per foot, but can be longer depending on the dielectrics used in the digital cable. When the transition reaches the end of the transmission line (in the DAC), a reflection can occur that propagates back to the driver in the Transport. Small reflections can occur in even well-matched systems. When the reflection reaches the driver, it can again be reflected back towards the DAC. This ping-pong effect can sustain itself for several bounces depending on the losses in the cable. It is not unusual to see 3-5 of these reflections before they finally decay away, mainly when using the best digital cables, which are usually low-loss. So, how does this affect the jitter? When the first reflection returns to the DAC, if the transition already in process at the receiver has not been completed, the reflection voltage will superimpose itself on the transition voltage, causing the transition to shift in time. The DAC will sample the transition in this time-shifted state, and there you have jitter. Lets look at a numerical example: If the rise-time is 25 nanoseconds and the cable length is 3 feet, then the propagation time is about 6 nanoseconds. Once the transition has arrived at the receiver, the reflection propagates back to the driver (6 nanoseconds), and then the driver reflects this back to the receiver (6 nanoseconds) = 12 nanoseconds. So, as seen at the receiver, 12 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started, we have a reflection superimposing on the transition. This is right about the time that the receiver will try to sample the transition, right around 0 volts DC. Not good. Now, if the cable had been 1.5 meters, the reflection would have arrived 18 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started at the receiver. This is much better because the receiver has likely already sampled the transition by this time.Unfortunately, better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

QED DAV Digital SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable 5m RCA-BNC New. Chord Linn

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:34 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 63.94 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 145096906793
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1023|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 3,7 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    QED DAV FLX1 solid-core oxygen-free copper cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm RCA plug, gold plated contacts and a high-end Hicon BNC, used by Nordost for years on their cables. Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This bargain-priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to BNC cable can be made at any length. (Up to a recommended maximum of 5m).This cable is unusual in that most RCAs plugs are not 75 Ohm, so no matter how good the cable, the plugs will cause reflections of the high-frequency digital signal and cause an increased risk of timing errors (jitter). These plugs designed originally for 75 Ohm use in component video and RF applications are a perfect fit for the QED cable and ironically perform better than any of the QED plugs on this cable.The Hicon BNC is also 75 Ohms high end cable (used by Nordost in their cables), reducing reflections and thus jittering and improving sound quality. Background Q: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever?A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late!Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTIONIn the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help? Jitter The phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. Interference Finally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Length of cable – why 1.5m? Summary There are only two occasions in audio where a longer cable – or an optimum length cable is better than a short one. Digital cables have an optimum length of 1.5m or more. (The other occasion is for MM phono cartridges, which need a specific capacitance). The reason for this requires an explanation. Please refer to the diagram in the photos. The signal travelling down a SPDIF (so-called digital cable) is actually a square wave ANALOGUE voltage signal; however, in reality, this square does not have instantaneous changes - the squares are sloped and somewhat rounded off, too, as it takes some time to change state from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0. The accuracy of the pulses at the end of the cable determines how accurately the source can interpret the signal in value 1 or 0 and also timing which is not so easy. The signal reflects back off the ends of the cable, the plugs and connected equipment (echoing back and forth). It produces ghost images of itself, which can fool the receiver into thinking that the ghost signals are the original signals. With short cables, under 1m, the ghost signals arrive close to the originals within the transition time frame from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 before the transition occurs. A 1m cable means the reflection arrives at about the same time as the transition is to be recorded. With longer cables, the reflection arrives too late to influence the receiver (The transition has already been recorded). Longer cables also mean lower amplitude or signal reflection; thus receiver can more easily determine between the correct signal and the spurious reflections. The bottom line is that a longer cable eliminates the false readings from the ghost images and thus reduces timing errors, called jitter, and therefore sounds better. Measurements and experimentation have determined the optimum size to be 1.5m or more. Very detailed explanation- for the curious, accompanies the diagram in the photos. Why SPDIF cables should be 1.5m long, detailed explanation. When the SPDIF signal is launched into the cable from the Transport, it is essentially a voltage square wave, consisting of rising and falling edges. These edges are no more than voltage transitions from about –250mV to +250mV, the rising edge transitioning from minus voltage to plus voltage and the falling edge transitioning from plus voltage to minus voltage. When an edge transitions, it can be described as having a rise-time or fall-time. This is the time it takes for the signal to transition from 10% to 90% of the entire voltage swing. (Note that this DOES Not happen instantaneously). The rise-time is important because this is what causes reflections on the transmission line. If the rise-time were very, very slow, say 50 nanoseconds, then there would be no reflections on the transmission line unless it was extremely long. Alternately, if the rise-time were less than one nanosecond, reflections would occur at every boundary, such as the connection from the circuit board to the wires that go to the connector. Typical stock Transports have around 25 nanosecond rise times. The primary concern for the manufacturer is to pass FCC regulations for emissions and electromagnetic interference and make the interface reliable. When the regulatory testing is done, they attach inexpensive, inferior cables and measure the emissions. To ensure that the manufacturer passes these tests, they take several precautions. One is designing in the slower than necessary 25 nanosecond rise-time. Another is inserting various filters in the Transport to eliminate high frequencies from the signal. As a result of these choices, there is a hazard created in using too short a digital cable. It is a result of the slow rise-time. When a transition is launched into the cable, it takes a period of time to propagate or transit to the other end. This propagation time is somewhat slower than the speed of light, usually around two nanoseconds per foot, but can be longer depending on the dielectrics used in the digital cable. When the transition reaches the end of the transmission line (in the DAC), a reflection can occur that propagates back to the driver in the Transport. Small reflections can occur in even well-matched systems. When the reflection reaches the driver, it can again be reflected back towards the DAC. This ping-pong effect can sustain itself for several bounces depending on the losses in the cable. It is not unusual to see 3-5 of these reflections before they finally decay away, mainly when using the best digital cables, which are usually low-loss. So, how does this affect the jitter? When the first reflection returns to the DAC, if the transition already in process at the receiver has not been completed, the reflection voltage will superimpose itself on the transition voltage, causing the transition to shift in time. The DAC will sample the transition in this time-shifted state, and there you have jitter. Lets look at a numerical example: If the rise-time is 25 nanoseconds and the cable length is 3 feet, then the propagation time is about 6 nanoseconds. Once the transition has arrived at the receiver, the reflection propagates back to the driver (6 nanoseconds), and then the driver reflects this back to the receiver (6 nanoseconds) = 12 nanoseconds. So, as seen at the receiver, 12 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started, we have a reflection superimposing on the transition. This is right about the time that the receiver will try to sample the transition, right around 0 volts DC. Not good. Now, if the cable had been 1.5 meters, the reflection would have arrived 18 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started at the receiver. This is much better because the receiver has likely already sampled the transition by this time.Unfortunately, better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

Monster Digital SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable 1.0m RCA-BNC NOS RED

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:34 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 25.57 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 134581558523
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1023|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 2,0 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    Monster M Series solid core oxygen free cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm BNC plug, gold plated contacts. Gas injected dielectric to reduce effect of insulation on signal, reducing jitter Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This is a bargain priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to BNC cable. This was originally sold by Monster in long lengths for component video, the same 75 Ohm cable can equally be used for SPDIF as the requirement is the same. BackgroundQ: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever?A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late!Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTIONIn the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help?JitterThe phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. InterferenceFinally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Unfortunately, that means better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

QED DAV Pro Digital SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable 1.5m RCA-RCA Ferrites New

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:34 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 38.36 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 134581558503
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1023|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 3,0 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    QED DAV FLX1 solid core oxygen free copper cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm RCA plug, gold plated contacts. Ferrite noise absorbing beads added at each end. Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This is a bargain priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to RCA cable, and can be made in any length. (up to a recommended maximum of 5m). This cable is unusual in that most RCAs plugs are not 75 Ohm, so no matter how good the cable, the plugs will cause reflections of the high frequency digital signal and cause increased risk of timing errors (jitter). These plugs designed originally for 75 Ohm use in component video and RF applications are a perfect fit for the QED cable and ironically perform better than any of the QED plugs on this cable. Background Q: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever?A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late!Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTIONIn the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help? Jitter The phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. Interference Finally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Length of cable – why 1.5m? Summary There are only two occasions in audio where a longer cable – or an optimum length cable is better than a short one. Digital cables have an optimum length of 1.5m or more. (The other occasion is for MM phono cartridges, which need a specific capacitance). The reason for this requires an explanation. Please refer to the diagram in the photos. The signal travelling down a SPDIF (so-called digital cable) is actually a square wave ANALOGUE voltage signal; however, in reality, this square does not have instantaneous changes - the squares are sloped and somewhat rounded off, too, as it takes some time to change state from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0. The accuracy of the pulses at the end of the cable determines how accurately the source can interpret the signal in value 1 or 0 and also timing which is not so easy. The signal reflects back off the ends of the cable, the plugs and connected equipment (echoing back and forth). It produces ghost images of itself, which can fool the receiver into thinking that the ghost signals are the original signals. With short cables, under 1m, the ghost signals arrive close to the originals within the transition time frame from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 before the transition occurs. A 1m cable means the reflection arrives at about the same time as the transition is to be recorded. With longer cables, the reflection arrives too late to influence the receiver (The transition has already been recorded). Longer cables also mean lower amplitude or signal reflection; thus receiver can more easily determine between the correct signal and the spurious reflections. The bottom line is that a longer cable eliminates the false readings from the ghost images and thus reduces timing errors, called jitter, and therefore sounds better. Measurements and experimentation have determined the optimum size to be 1.5m or more. Very detailed explanation- for the curious, accompanies the diagram in the photos. Why SPDIF cables should be 1.5m long, detailed explanation. When the SPDIF signal is launched into the cable from the Transport, it is essentially a voltage square wave, consisting of rising and falling edges. These edges are no more than voltage transitions from about –250mV to +250mV, the rising edge transitioning from minus voltage to plus voltage and the falling edge transitioning from plus voltage to minus voltage. When an edge transitions, it can be described as having a rise-time or fall-time. This is the time it takes for the signal to transition from 10% to 90% of the entire voltage swing. (Note that this DOES Not happen instantaneously). The rise-time is important because this is what causes reflections on the transmission line. If the rise-time were very, very slow, say 50 nanoseconds, then there would be no reflections on the transmission line unless it was extremely long. Alternately, if the rise-time were less than one nanosecond, reflections would occur at every boundary, such as the connection from the circuit board to the wires that go to the connector. Typical stock Transports have around 25 nanosecond rise times. The primary concern for the manufacturer is to pass FCC regulations for emissions and electromagnetic interference and make the interface reliable. When the regulatory testing is done, they attach inexpensive, inferior cables and measure the emissions. To ensure that the manufacturer passes these tests, they take several precautions. One is designing in the slower than necessary 25 nanosecond rise-time. Another is inserting various filters in the Transport to eliminate high frequencies from the signal. As a result of these choices, there is a hazard created in using too short a digital cable. It is a result of the slow rise-time. When a transition is launched into the cable, it takes a period of time to propagate or transit to the other end. This propagation time is somewhat slower than the speed of light, usually around two nanoseconds per foot, but can be longer depending on the dielectrics used in the digital cable. When the transition reaches the end of the transmission line (in the DAC), a reflection can occur that propagates back to the driver in the Transport. Small reflections can occur in even well-matched systems. When the reflection reaches the driver, it can again be reflected back towards the DAC. This ping-pong effect can sustain itself for several bounces depending on the losses in the cable. It is not unusual to see 3-5 of these reflections before they finally decay away, mainly when using the best digital cables, which are usually low-loss. So, how does this affect the jitter? When the first reflection returns to the DAC, if the transition already in process at the receiver has not been completed, the reflection voltage will superimpose itself on the transition voltage, causing the transition to shift in time. The DAC will sample the transition in this time-shifted state, and there you have jitter. Lets look at a numerical example: If the rise-time is 25 nanoseconds and the cable length is 3 feet, then the propagation time is about 6 nanoseconds. Once the transition has arrived at the receiver, the reflection propagates back to the driver (6 nanoseconds), and then the driver reflects this back to the receiver (6 nanoseconds) = 12 nanoseconds. So, as seen at the receiver, 12 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started, we have a reflection superimposing on the transition. This is right about the time that the receiver will try to sample the transition, right around 0 volts DC. Not good. Now, if the cable had been 1.5 meters, the reflection would have arrived 18 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started at the receiver. This is much better because the receiver has likely already sampled the transition by this time.Unfortunately, better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

Monster Digital 1.0m SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable RCA-BNC NOS

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:34 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 20.92 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 134581558517
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1023|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 2,0 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    Monster M Series solid core oxygen free cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm BNC plug, gold plated contacts. Gas injected dielectric to reduce effect of insulation on signal, reducing jitter Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This is a bargain priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to BNC cable. This was originally sold by Monster in long lengths for component video, the same 75 Ohm cable can equally be used for SPDIF as the specification is the same. I have fitted a gold plated BNC plug to connect to DACs. Background Q: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever? A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late! Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components? The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTION In the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV. The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help? Jitter The phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) Reflections In addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. Interference Finally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Unfortunately, that means better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

QED DAV Professional Digital SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable 2.5m RCA-RCA New

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:34 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 40.69 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 145096906130
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1023|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 3,05 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    QED DAV FLX1 solid core oxygen free copper cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm RCA plug, gold plated contacts. Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This is a bargain priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to RCA cable, and can be made in any length. (up to a recommended maximum of 5m). This cable is unusual in that most RCAs plugs are not 75 Ohm, so no matter how good the cable, the plugs will cause reflections of the high frequency digital signal and cause increased risk of timing errors (jitter). These plugs designed originally for 75 Ohm use in component video and RF applications are a perfect fit for the QED cable and ironically perform better than any of the QED plugs on this cable. Background Q: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever?A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late!Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTIONIn the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help? Jitter The phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. Interference Finally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Length of cable – why 1.5m? Summary There are only two occasions in audio where a longer cable – or an optimum length cable is better than a short one. Digital cables have an optimum length of 1.5m or more. (The other occasion is for MM phono cartridges, which need a specific capacitance). The reason for this requires an explanation. Please refer to the diagram in the photos. The signal travelling down a SPDIF (so-called digital cable) is actually a square wave ANALOGUE voltage signal; however, in reality, this square does not have instantaneous changes - the squares are sloped and somewhat rounded off, too, as it takes some time to change state from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0. The accuracy of the pulses at the end of the cable determines how accurately the source can interpret the signal in value 1 or 0 and also timing which is not so easy. The signal reflects back off the ends of the cable, the plugs and connected equipment (echoing back and forth). It produces ghost images of itself, which can fool the receiver into thinking that the ghost signals are the original signals. With short cables, under 1m, the ghost signals arrive close to the originals within the transition time frame from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 before the transition occurs. A 1m cable means the reflection arrives at about the same time as the transition is to be recorded. With longer cables, the reflection arrives too late to influence the receiver (The transition has already been recorded). Longer cables also mean lower amplitude or signal reflection; thus receiver can more easily determine between the correct signal and the spurious reflections. The bottom line is that a longer cable eliminates the false readings from the ghost images and thus reduces timing errors, called jitter, and therefore sounds better. Measurements and experimentation have determined the optimum size to be 1.5m or more. Very detailed explanation- for the curious, accompanies the diagram in the photos. Why SPDIF cables should be 1.5m long, detailed explanation. When the SPDIF signal is launched into the cable from the Transport, it is essentially a voltage square wave, consisting of rising and falling edges. These edges are no more than voltage transitions from about –250mV to +250mV, the rising edge transitioning from minus voltage to plus voltage and the falling edge transitioning from plus voltage to minus voltage. When an edge transitions, it can be described as having a rise-time or fall-time. This is the time it takes for the signal to transition from 10% to 90% of the entire voltage swing. (Note that this DOES Not happen instantaneously). The rise-time is important because this is what causes reflections on the transmission line. If the rise-time were very, very slow, say 50 nanoseconds, then there would be no reflections on the transmission line unless it was extremely long. Alternately, if the rise-time were less than one nanosecond, reflections would occur at every boundary, such as the connection from the circuit board to the wires that go to the connector. Typical stock Transports have around 25 nanosecond rise times. The primary concern for the manufacturer is to pass FCC regulations for emissions and electromagnetic interference and make the interface reliable. When the regulatory testing is done, they attach inexpensive, inferior cables and measure the emissions. To ensure that the manufacturer passes these tests, they take several precautions. One is designing in the slower than necessary 25 nanosecond rise-time. Another is inserting various filters in the Transport to eliminate high frequencies from the signal. As a result of these choices, there is a hazard created in using too short a digital cable. It is a result of the slow rise-time. When a transition is launched into the cable, it takes a period of time to propagate or transit to the other end. This propagation time is somewhat slower than the speed of light, usually around two nanoseconds per foot, but can be longer depending on the dielectrics used in the digital cable. When the transition reaches the end of the transmission line (in the DAC), a reflection can occur that propagates back to the driver in the Transport. Small reflections can occur in even well-matched systems. When the reflection reaches the driver, it can again be reflected back towards the DAC. This ping-pong effect can sustain itself for several bounces depending on the losses in the cable. It is not unusual to see 3-5 of these reflections before they finally decay away, mainly when using the best digital cables, which are usually low-loss. So, how does this affect the jitter? When the first reflection returns to the DAC, if the transition already in process at the receiver has not been completed, the reflection voltage will superimpose itself on the transition voltage, causing the transition to shift in time. The DAC will sample the transition in this time-shifted state, and there you have jitter. Lets look at a numerical example: If the rise-time is 25 nanoseconds and the cable length is 3 feet, then the propagation time is about 6 nanoseconds. Once the transition has arrived at the receiver, the reflection propagates back to the driver (6 nanoseconds), and then the driver reflects this back to the receiver (6 nanoseconds) = 12 nanoseconds. So, as seen at the receiver, 12 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started, we have a reflection superimposing on the transition. This is right about the time that the receiver will try to sample the transition, right around 0 volts DC. Not good. Now, if the cable had been 1.5 meters, the reflection would have arrived 18 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started at the receiver. This is much better because the receiver has likely already sampled the transition by this time.Unfortunately, better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

QED DAV Pro Digital SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable 1.5m RCA-BNC Ferrites New

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:34 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 45.34 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 145096906144
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1023|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 3,0 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    QED DAV FLX1 solid core oxygen free copper cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm RCA plug to Hicon gold-plated BNC contacts. Ferrite noise absorbing beads added at each end - this is a symmetrical cable so can be RCA to BNC or BNC to RCA. Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This is a bargain priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to RCA cable, and can be made in any length. (up to a recommended maximum of 5m). This cable is unusual in that most RCAs plugs are not 75 Ohm, so no matter how good the cable, the plugs will cause reflections of the high frequency digital signal and cause increased risk of timing errors (jitter). These plugs designed originally for 75 Ohm use in component video and RF applications are a perfect fit for the QED cable and ironically perform better than any of the QED plugs on this cable. Background Q: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever?A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late!Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTIONIn the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help? Jitter The phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. Interference Finally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Length of cable – why 1.5m? Summary There are only two occasions in audio where a longer cable – or an optimum length cable is better than a short one. Digital cables have an optimum length of 1.5m or more. (The other occasion is for MM phono cartridges, which need a specific capacitance). The reason for this requires an explanation. Please refer to the diagram in the photos. The signal travelling down a SPDIF (so-called digital cable) is actually a square wave ANALOGUE voltage signal; however, in reality, this square does not have instantaneous changes - the squares are sloped and somewhat rounded off, too, as it takes some time to change state from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0. The accuracy of the pulses at the end of the cable determines how accurately the source can interpret the signal in value 1 or 0 and also timing which is not so easy. The signal reflects back off the ends of the cable, the plugs and connected equipment (echoing back and forth). It produces ghost images of itself, which can fool the receiver into thinking that the ghost signals are the original signals. With short cables, under 1m, the ghost signals arrive close to the originals within the transition time frame from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 before the transition occurs. A 1m cable means the reflection arrives at about the same time as the transition is to be recorded. With longer cables, the reflection arrives too late to influence the receiver (The transition has already been recorded). Longer cables also mean lower amplitude or signal reflection; thus receiver can more easily determine between the correct signal and the spurious reflections. The bottom line is that a longer cable eliminates the false readings from the ghost images and thus reduces timing errors, called jitter, and therefore sounds better. Measurements and experimentation have determined the optimum size to be 1.5m or more. Very detailed explanation- for the curious, accompanies the diagram in the photos. Why SPDIF cables should be 1.5m long, detailed explanation. When the SPDIF signal is launched into the cable from the Transport, it is essentially a voltage square wave, consisting of rising and falling edges. These edges are no more than voltage transitions from about –250mV to +250mV, the rising edge transitioning from minus voltage to plus voltage and the falling edge transitioning from plus voltage to minus voltage. When an edge transitions, it can be described as having a rise-time or fall-time. This is the time it takes for the signal to transition from 10% to 90% of the entire voltage swing. (Note that this DOES Not happen instantaneously). The rise-time is important because this is what causes reflections on the transmission line. If the rise-time were very, very slow, say 50 nanoseconds, then there would be no reflections on the transmission line unless it was extremely long. Alternately, if the rise-time were less than one nanosecond, reflections would occur at every boundary, such as the connection from the circuit board to the wires that go to the connector. Typical stock Transports have around 25 nanosecond rise times. The primary concern for the manufacturer is to pass FCC regulations for emissions and electromagnetic interference and make the interface reliable. When the regulatory testing is done, they attach inexpensive, inferior cables and measure the emissions. To ensure that the manufacturer passes these tests, they take several precautions. One is designing in the slower than necessary 25 nanosecond rise-time. Another is inserting various filters in the Transport to eliminate high frequencies from the signal. As a result of these choices, there is a hazard created in using too short a digital cable. It is a result of the slow rise-time. When a transition is launched into the cable, it takes a period of time to propagate or transit to the other end. This propagation time is somewhat slower than the speed of light, usually around two nanoseconds per foot, but can be longer depending on the dielectrics used in the digital cable. When the transition reaches the end of the transmission line (in the DAC), a reflection can occur that propagates back to the driver in the Transport. Small reflections can occur in even well-matched systems. When the reflection reaches the driver, it can again be reflected back towards the DAC. This ping-pong effect can sustain itself for several bounces depending on the losses in the cable. It is not unusual to see 3-5 of these reflections before they finally decay away, mainly when using the best digital cables, which are usually low-loss. So, how does this affect the jitter? When the first reflection returns to the DAC, if the transition already in process at the receiver has not been completed, the reflection voltage will superimpose itself on the transition voltage, causing the transition to shift in time. The DAC will sample the transition in this time-shifted state, and there you have jitter. Lets look at a numerical example: If the rise-time is 25 nanoseconds and the cable length is 3 feet, then the propagation time is about 6 nanoseconds. Once the transition has arrived at the receiver, the reflection propagates back to the driver (6 nanoseconds), and then the driver reflects this back to the receiver (6 nanoseconds) = 12 nanoseconds. So, as seen at the receiver, 12 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started, we have a reflection superimposing on the transition. This is right about the time that the receiver will try to sample the transition, right around 0 volts DC. Not good. Now, if the cable had been 1.5 meters, the reflection would have arrived 18 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started at the receiver. This is much better because the receiver has likely already sampled the transition by this time.Unfortunately, better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

QED DAV Professional Digital SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable 3m RCA-RCA New

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:33 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 42.2 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 145091090611
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1019|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 3,4 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    QED DAV FLX1 solid core oxygen free copper cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm RCA plug, gold plated contacts. Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This is a bargain priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to RCA cable, and can be made in any length. (up to a recommended maximum of 5m). This cable is unusual in that most RCAs plugs are not 75 Ohm, so no matter how good the cable, the plugs will cause reflections of the high frequency digital signal and cause increased risk of timing errors (jitter). These plugs designed originally for 75 Ohm use in component video and RF applications are a perfect fit for the QED cable and ironically perform better than any of the QED plugs on this cable. Background Q: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever?A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late!Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTIONIn the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help? Jitter The phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. Interference Finally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Length of cable – why 1.5m? Summary There are only two occasions in audio where a longer cable – or an optimum length cable is better than a short one. Digital cables have an optimum length of 1.5m or more. (The other occasion is for MM phono cartridges, which need a specific capacitance). The reason for this requires an explanation. Please refer to the diagram in the photos. The signal travelling down a SPDIF (so-called digital cable) is actually a square wave ANALOGUE voltage signal; however, in reality, this square does not have instantaneous changes - the squares are sloped and somewhat rounded off, too, as it takes some time to change state from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0. The accuracy of the pulses at the end of the cable determines how accurately the source can interpret the signal in value 1 or 0 and also timing which is not so easy. The signal reflects back off the ends of the cable, the plugs and connected equipment (echoing back and forth). It produces ghost images of itself, which can fool the receiver into thinking that the ghost signals are the original signals. With short cables, under 1m, the ghost signals arrive close to the originals within the transition time frame from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 before the transition occurs. A 1m cable means the reflection arrives at about the same time as the transition is to be recorded. With longer cables, the reflection arrives too late to influence the receiver (The transition has already been recorded). Longer cables also mean lower amplitude or signal reflection; thus receiver can more easily determine between the correct signal and the spurious reflections. The bottom line is that a longer cable eliminates the false readings from the ghost images and thus reduces timing errors, called jitter, and therefore sounds better. Measurements and experimentation have determined the optimum size to be 1.5m or more. Very detailed explanation- for the curious, accompanies the diagram in the photos. Why SPDIF cables should be 1.5m long, detailed explanation. When the SPDIF signal is launched into the cable from the Transport, it is essentially a voltage square wave, consisting of rising and falling edges. These edges are no more than voltage transitions from about –250mV to +250mV, the rising edge transitioning from minus voltage to plus voltage and the falling edge transitioning from plus voltage to minus voltage. When an edge transitions, it can be described as having a rise-time or fall-time. This is the time it takes for the signal to transition from 10% to 90% of the entire voltage swing. (Note that this DOES Not happen instantaneously). The rise-time is important because this is what causes reflections on the transmission line. If the rise-time were very, very slow, say 50 nanoseconds, then there would be no reflections on the transmission line unless it was extremely long. Alternately, if the rise-time were less than one nanosecond, reflections would occur at every boundary, such as the connection from the circuit board to the wires that go to the connector. Typical stock Transports have around 25 nanosecond rise times. The primary concern for the manufacturer is to pass FCC regulations for emissions and electromagnetic interference and make the interface reliable. When the regulatory testing is done, they attach inexpensive, inferior cables and measure the emissions. To ensure that the manufacturer passes these tests, they take several precautions. One is designing in the slower than necessary 25 nanosecond rise-time. Another is inserting various filters in the Transport to eliminate high frequencies from the signal. As a result of these choices, there is a hazard created in using too short a digital cable. It is a result of the slow rise-time. When a transition is launched into the cable, it takes a period of time to propagate or transit to the other end. This propagation time is somewhat slower than the speed of light, usually around two nanoseconds per foot, but can be longer depending on the dielectrics used in the digital cable. When the transition reaches the end of the transmission line (in the DAC), a reflection can occur that propagates back to the driver in the Transport. Small reflections can occur in even well-matched systems. When the reflection reaches the driver, it can again be reflected back towards the DAC. This ping-pong effect can sustain itself for several bounces depending on the losses in the cable. It is not unusual to see 3-5 of these reflections before they finally decay away, mainly when using the best digital cables, which are usually low-loss. So, how does this affect the jitter? When the first reflection returns to the DAC, if the transition already in process at the receiver has not been completed, the reflection voltage will superimpose itself on the transition voltage, causing the transition to shift in time. The DAC will sample the transition in this time-shifted state, and there you have jitter. Lets look at a numerical example: If the rise-time is 25 nanoseconds and the cable length is 3 feet, then the propagation time is about 6 nanoseconds. Once the transition has arrived at the receiver, the reflection propagates back to the driver (6 nanoseconds), and then the driver reflects this back to the receiver (6 nanoseconds) = 12 nanoseconds. So, as seen at the receiver, 12 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started, we have a reflection superimposing on the transition. This is right about the time that the receiver will try to sample the transition, right around 0 volts DC. Not good. Now, if the cable had been 1.5 meters, the reflection would have arrived 18 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started at the receiver. This is much better because the receiver has likely already sampled the transition by this time.Unfortunately, better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

QED DAV Professional Digital SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable 5m RCA-RCA New

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:33 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 58.13 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 145096906776
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1023|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 3,7 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    QED DAV FLX1 solid core oxygen free copper cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm RCA plug, gold plated contacts. Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This is a bargain priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to RCA cable, and can be made in any length. (up to a recommended maximum of 5m). This cable is unusual in that most RCAs plugs are not 75 Ohm, so no matter how good the cable, the plugs will cause reflections of the high frequency digital signal and cause increased risk of timing errors (jitter). These plugs designed originally for 75 Ohm use in component video and RF applications are a perfect fit for the QED cable and ironically perform better than any of the QED plugs on this cable. Background Q: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever?A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late!Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTIONIn the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help? Jitter The phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. Interference Finally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Length of cable – why 1.5m? Summary There are only two occasions in audio where a longer cable – or an optimum length cable is better than a short one. Digital cables have an optimum length of 1.5m or more. (The other occasion is for MM phono cartridges, which need a specific capacitance). The reason for this requires an explanation. Please refer to the diagram in the photos. The signal travelling down a SPDIF (so-called digital cable) is actually a square wave ANALOGUE voltage signal; however, in reality, this square does not have instantaneous changes - the squares are sloped and somewhat rounded off, too, as it takes some time to change state from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0. The accuracy of the pulses at the end of the cable determines how accurately the source can interpret the signal in value 1 or 0 and also timing which is not so easy. The signal reflects back off the ends of the cable, the plugs and connected equipment (echoing back and forth). It produces ghost images of itself, which can fool the receiver into thinking that the ghost signals are the original signals. With short cables, under 1m, the ghost signals arrive close to the originals within the transition time frame from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 before the transition occurs. A 1m cable means the reflection arrives at about the same time as the transition is to be recorded. With longer cables, the reflection arrives too late to influence the receiver (The transition has already been recorded). Longer cables also mean lower amplitude or signal reflection; thus receiver can more easily determine between the correct signal and the spurious reflections. The bottom line is that a longer cable eliminates the false readings from the ghost images and thus reduces timing errors, called jitter, and therefore sounds better. Measurements and experimentation have determined the optimum size to be 1.5m or more. Very detailed explanation- for the curious, accompanies the diagram in the photos. Why SPDIF cables should be 1.5m long, detailed explanation. When the SPDIF signal is launched into the cable from the Transport, it is essentially a voltage square wave, consisting of rising and falling edges. These edges are no more than voltage transitions from about –250mV to +250mV, the rising edge transitioning from minus voltage to plus voltage and the falling edge transitioning from plus voltage to minus voltage. When an edge transitions, it can be described as having a rise-time or fall-time. This is the time it takes for the signal to transition from 10% to 90% of the entire voltage swing. (Note that this DOES Not happen instantaneously). The rise-time is important because this is what causes reflections on the transmission line. If the rise-time were very, very slow, say 50 nanoseconds, then there would be no reflections on the transmission line unless it was extremely long. Alternately, if the rise-time were less than one nanosecond, reflections would occur at every boundary, such as the connection from the circuit board to the wires that go to the connector. Typical stock Transports have around 25 nanosecond rise times. The primary concern for the manufacturer is to pass FCC regulations for emissions and electromagnetic interference and make the interface reliable. When the regulatory testing is done, they attach inexpensive, inferior cables and measure the emissions. To ensure that the manufacturer passes these tests, they take several precautions. One is designing in the slower than necessary 25 nanosecond rise-time. Another is inserting various filters in the Transport to eliminate high frequencies from the signal. As a result of these choices, there is a hazard created in using too short a digital cable. It is a result of the slow rise-time. When a transition is launched into the cable, it takes a period of time to propagate or transit to the other end. This propagation time is somewhat slower than the speed of light, usually around two nanoseconds per foot, but can be longer depending on the dielectrics used in the digital cable. When the transition reaches the end of the transmission line (in the DAC), a reflection can occur that propagates back to the driver in the Transport. Small reflections can occur in even well-matched systems. When the reflection reaches the driver, it can again be reflected back towards the DAC. This ping-pong effect can sustain itself for several bounces depending on the losses in the cable. It is not unusual to see 3-5 of these reflections before they finally decay away, mainly when using the best digital cables, which are usually low-loss. So, how does this affect the jitter? When the first reflection returns to the DAC, if the transition already in process at the receiver has not been completed, the reflection voltage will superimpose itself on the transition voltage, causing the transition to shift in time. The DAC will sample the transition in this time-shifted state, and there you have jitter. Lets look at a numerical example: If the rise-time is 25 nanoseconds and the cable length is 3 feet, then the propagation time is about 6 nanoseconds. Once the transition has arrived at the receiver, the reflection propagates back to the driver (6 nanoseconds), and then the driver reflects this back to the receiver (6 nanoseconds) = 12 nanoseconds. So, as seen at the receiver, 12 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started, we have a reflection superimposing on the transition. This is right about the time that the receiver will try to sample the transition, right around 0 volts DC. Not good. Now, if the cable had been 1.5 meters, the reflection would have arrived 18 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started at the receiver. This is much better because the receiver has likely already sampled the transition by this time.Unfortunately, better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

QED DAV Digital SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable 1m RCA-BNC New

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:33 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 34.87 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 145096906789
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1023|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 3,4 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    QED DAV FLX1 solid core oxygen free copper cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm RCA plug, gold plated contacts. Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This is a bargain priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to BNC cable, and can be made in any length. (up to a recommended maximum of 5m). This cable is unusual in that most RCAs plugs are not 75 Ohm, so no matter how good the cable, the plugs will cause reflections of the high frequency digital signal and cause increased risk of timing errors (jitter). These plugs designed originally for 75 Ohm use in component video and RF applications are a perfect fit for the QED cable and ironically perform better than any of the QED plugs on this cable. BackgroundQ: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever?A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late!Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTIONIn the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help?JitterThe phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. InterferenceFinally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Unfortunately, that means better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

QED DAV Digital SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable 2m RCA-BNC New. Chord Linn

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:33 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 45.34 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 145096906155
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1023|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 3,4 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    QED DAV FLX1 solid-core oxygen-free copper cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm RCA plug, gold plated contacts and a high-end Hicon BNC, used by Nordost for years on their cables. Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This bargain-priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to BNC cable can be made at any length. (Up to a recommended maximum of 5m).Optimum length is 1.5-2m - see detailed explanation below. This cable is unusual in that most RCAs plugs are not 75 Ohm, so no matter how good the cable, the plugs will cause reflections of the high-frequency digital signal and cause an increased risk of timing errors (jitter). These plugs designed originally for 75 Ohm use in component video and RF applications are a perfect fit for the QED cable and ironically perform better than any of the QED plugs on this cable.The Hicon BNC is also 75 Ohms high end cable (used by Nordost in their cables), reducing reflections and thus jittering and improving sound quality. Background Q: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever?A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late!Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTIONIn the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help? Jitter The phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. Interference Finally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Length of cable – why 1.5m? Summary There are only two occasions in audio where a longer cable – or an optimum length cable is better than a short one. Digital cables have an optimum length of 1.5m or more. (The other occasion is for MM phono cartridges, which need a specific capacitance). The reason for this requires an explanation. Please refer to the diagram in the photos. The signal travelling down a SPDIF (so-called digital cable) is actually a square wave ANALOGUE voltage signal; however, in reality, this square does not have instantaneous changes - the squares are sloped and somewhat rounded off, too, as it takes some time to change state from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0. The accuracy of the pulses at the end of the cable determines how accurately the source can interpret the signal in value 1 or 0 and also timing which is not so easy. The signal reflects back off the ends of the cable, the plugs and connected equipment (echoing back and forth). It produces ghost images of itself, which can fool the receiver into thinking that the ghost signals are the original signals. With short cables, under 1m, the ghost signals arrive close to the originals within the transition time frame from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 before the transition occurs. A 1m cable means the reflection arrives at about the same time as the transition is to be recorded. With longer cables, the reflection arrives too late to influence the receiver (The transition has already been recorded). Longer cables also mean lower amplitude or signal reflection; thus receiver can more easily determine between the correct signal and the spurious reflections. The bottom line is that a longer cable eliminates the false readings from the ghost images and thus reduces timing errors, called jitter, and therefore sounds better. Measurements and experimentation have determined the optimum size to be 1.5m or more. Very detailed explanation- for the curious, accompanies the diagram in the photos. Why SPDIF cables should be 1.5m long, detailed explanation. When the SPDIF signal is launched into the cable from the Transport, it is essentially a voltage square wave, consisting of rising and falling edges. These edges are no more than voltage transitions from about –250mV to +250mV, the rising edge transitioning from minus voltage to plus voltage and the falling edge transitioning from plus voltage to minus voltage. When an edge transitions, it can be described as having a rise-time or fall-time. This is the time it takes for the signal to transition from 10% to 90% of the entire voltage swing. (Note that this DOES Not happen instantaneously). The rise-time is important because this is what causes reflections on the transmission line. If the rise-time were very, very slow, say 50 nanoseconds, then there would be no reflections on the transmission line unless it was extremely long. Alternately, if the rise-time were less than one nanosecond, reflections would occur at every boundary, such as the connection from the circuit board to the wires that go to the connector. Typical stock Transports have around 25 nanosecond rise times. The primary concern for the manufacturer is to pass FCC regulations for emissions and electromagnetic interference and make the interface reliable. When the regulatory testing is done, they attach inexpensive, inferior cables and measure the emissions. To ensure that the manufacturer passes these tests, they take several precautions. One is designing in the slower than necessary 25 nanosecond rise-time. Another is inserting various filters in the Transport to eliminate high frequencies from the signal. As a result of these choices, there is a hazard created in using too short a digital cable. It is a result of the slow rise-time. When a transition is launched into the cable, it takes a period of time to propagate or transit to the other end. This propagation time is somewhat slower than the speed of light, usually around two nanoseconds per foot, but can be longer depending on the dielectrics used in the digital cable. When the transition reaches the end of the transmission line (in the DAC), a reflection can occur that propagates back to the driver in the Transport. Small reflections can occur in even well-matched systems. When the reflection reaches the driver, it can again be reflected back towards the DAC. This ping-pong effect can sustain itself for several bounces depending on the losses in the cable. It is not unusual to see 3-5 of these reflections before they finally decay away, mainly when using the best digital cables, which are usually low-loss. So, how does this affect the jitter? When the first reflection returns to the DAC, if the transition already in process at the receiver has not been completed, the reflection voltage will superimpose itself on the transition voltage, causing the transition to shift in time. The DAC will sample the transition in this time-shifted state, and there you have jitter. Lets look at a numerical example: If the rise-time is 25 nanoseconds and the cable length is 3 feet, then the propagation time is about 6 nanoseconds. Once the transition has arrived at the receiver, the reflection propagates back to the driver (6 nanoseconds), and then the driver reflects this back to the receiver (6 nanoseconds) = 12 nanoseconds. So, as seen at the receiver, 12 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started, we have a reflection superimposing on the transition. This is right about the time that the receiver will try to sample the transition, right around 0 volts DC. Not good. Now, if the cable had been 1.5 meters, the reflection would have arrived 18 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started at the receiver. This is much better because the receiver has likely already sampled the transition by this time.Unfortunately, better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

QED DAV Digital SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable 1.5m RCA-BNC New. Chord Linn

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:33 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 39.52 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 134581558492
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1023|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 3,4 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    QED DAV FLX1 solid-core oxygen-free copper cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm RCA plug, gold plated contacts and a high-end Hicon BNC, used by Nordost for years on their cables. Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This bargain-priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to BNC cable can be made at any length. (Up to a recommended maximum of 5m).Optimum length is 1.5-2m - see detailed explanation below. This cable is unusual in that most RCAs plugs are not 75 Ohm, so no matter how good the cable, the plugs will cause reflections of the high-frequency digital signal and cause an increased risk of timing errors (jitter). These plugs designed originally for 75 Ohm use in component video and RF applications are a perfect fit for the QED cable and ironically perform better than any of the QED plugs on this cable.The Hicon BNC is also 75 Ohms high end cable (used by Nordost in their cables), reducing reflections and thus jittering and improving sound quality. Background Q: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever?A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late!Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTIONIn the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help? Jitter The phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. Interference Finally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Length of cable – why 1.5m? Summary There are only two occasions in audio where a longer cable – or an optimum length cable is better than a short one. Digital cables have an optimum length of 1.5m or more. (The other occasion is for MM phono cartridges, which need a specific capacitance). The reason for this requires an explanation. Please refer to the diagram in the photos. The signal travelling down a SPDIF (so-called digital cable) is actually a square wave ANALOGUE voltage signal; however, in reality, this square does not have instantaneous changes - the squares are sloped and somewhat rounded off, too, as it takes some time to change state from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0. The accuracy of the pulses at the end of the cable determines how accurately the source can interpret the signal in value 1 or 0 and also timing which is not so easy. The signal reflects back off the ends of the cable, the plugs and connected equipment (echoing back and forth). It produces ghost images of itself, which can fool the receiver into thinking that the ghost signals are the original signals. With short cables, under 1m, the ghost signals arrive close to the originals within the transition time frame from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 before the transition occurs. A 1m cable means the reflection arrives at about the same time as the transition is to be recorded. With longer cables, the reflection arrives too late to influence the receiver (The transition has already been recorded). Longer cables also mean lower amplitude or signal reflection; thus receiver can more easily determine between the correct signal and the spurious reflections. The bottom line is that a longer cable eliminates the false readings from the ghost images and thus reduces timing errors, called jitter, and therefore sounds better. Measurements and experimentation have determined the optimum size to be 1.5m or more. Very detailed explanation- for the curious, accompanies the diagram in the photos. Why SPDIF cables should be 1.5m long, detailed explanation. When the SPDIF signal is launched into the cable from the Transport, it is essentially a voltage square wave, consisting of rising and falling edges. These edges are no more than voltage transitions from about –250mV to +250mV, the rising edge transitioning from minus voltage to plus voltage and the falling edge transitioning from plus voltage to minus voltage. When an edge transitions, it can be described as having a rise-time or fall-time. This is the time it takes for the signal to transition from 10% to 90% of the entire voltage swing. (Note that this DOES Not happen instantaneously). The rise-time is important because this is what causes reflections on the transmission line. If the rise-time were very, very slow, say 50 nanoseconds, then there would be no reflections on the transmission line unless it was extremely long. Alternately, if the rise-time were less than one nanosecond, reflections would occur at every boundary, such as the connection from the circuit board to the wires that go to the connector. Typical stock Transports have around 25 nanosecond rise times. The primary concern for the manufacturer is to pass FCC regulations for emissions and electromagnetic interference and make the interface reliable. When the regulatory testing is done, they attach inexpensive, inferior cables and measure the emissions. To ensure that the manufacturer passes these tests, they take several precautions. One is designing in the slower than necessary 25 nanosecond rise-time. Another is inserting various filters in the Transport to eliminate high frequencies from the signal. As a result of these choices, there is a hazard created in using too short a digital cable. It is a result of the slow rise-time. When a transition is launched into the cable, it takes a period of time to propagate or transit to the other end. This propagation time is somewhat slower than the speed of light, usually around two nanoseconds per foot, but can be longer depending on the dielectrics used in the digital cable. When the transition reaches the end of the transmission line (in the DAC), a reflection can occur that propagates back to the driver in the Transport. Small reflections can occur in even well-matched systems. When the reflection reaches the driver, it can again be reflected back towards the DAC. This ping-pong effect can sustain itself for several bounces depending on the losses in the cable. It is not unusual to see 3-5 of these reflections before they finally decay away, mainly when using the best digital cables, which are usually low-loss. So, how does this affect the jitter? When the first reflection returns to the DAC, if the transition already in process at the receiver has not been completed, the reflection voltage will superimpose itself on the transition voltage, causing the transition to shift in time. The DAC will sample the transition in this time-shifted state, and there you have jitter. Lets look at a numerical example: If the rise-time is 25 nanoseconds and the cable length is 3 feet, then the propagation time is about 6 nanoseconds. Once the transition has arrived at the receiver, the reflection propagates back to the driver (6 nanoseconds), and then the driver reflects this back to the receiver (6 nanoseconds) = 12 nanoseconds. So, as seen at the receiver, 12 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started, we have a reflection superimposing on the transition. This is right about the time that the receiver will try to sample the transition, right around 0 volts DC. Not good. Now, if the cable had been 1.5 meters, the reflection would have arrived 18 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started at the receiver. This is much better because the receiver has likely already sampled the transition by this time.Unfortunately, better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

Monster Digital SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable 1.5m RCA-BNC NOS

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:33 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 26.73 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 134581558498
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1023|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 1,85 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    Monster M Series solid core oxygen free cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm BNC plug, gold plated contacts. Gas injected dielectric to reduce effect of insulation on signal, reducing jitter Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This is a bargain priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to BNC cable. This was originally sold by Monster in long lengths for component video, the same 75 Ohm cable can equally be used for SPDIF as the requirement is the same. BackgroundQ: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever?A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late!Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTIONIn the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help?JitterThe phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. InterferenceFinally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Unfortunately, that means better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

QED DAV Digital SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable 3m RCA-BNC New. Chord Linn

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:33 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 49.99 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 134581558514
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1023|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 3,0 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    QED DAV FLX1 solid-core oxygen-free copper cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm RCA plug, gold plated contacts and a high-end Hicon BNC, used by Nordost for years on their cables. Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This bargain-priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to BNC cable can be made at any length. (Up to a recommended maximum of 5m).Optimum length is 1.5-2m - see detailed explanation below. This cable is unusual in that most RCAs plugs are not 75 Ohm, so no matter how good the cable, the plugs will cause reflections of the high-frequency digital signal and cause an increased risk of timing errors (jitter). These plugs designed originally for 75 Ohm use in component video and RF applications are a perfect fit for the QED cable and ironically perform better than any of the QED plugs on this cable.The Hicon BNC is also 75 Ohms high end cable (used by Nordost in their cables), reducing reflections and thus jittering and improving sound quality. Background Q: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever?A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late!Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTIONIn the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help? Jitter The phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. Interference Finally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Length of cable – why 1.5m? Summary There are only two occasions in audio where a longer cable – or an optimum length cable is better than a short one. Digital cables have an optimum length of 1.5m or more. (The other occasion is for MM phono cartridges, which need a specific capacitance). The reason for this requires an explanation. Please refer to the diagram in the photos. The signal travelling down a SPDIF (so-called digital cable) is actually a square wave ANALOGUE voltage signal; however, in reality, this square does not have instantaneous changes - the squares are sloped and somewhat rounded off, too, as it takes some time to change state from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0. The accuracy of the pulses at the end of the cable determines how accurately the source can interpret the signal in value 1 or 0 and also timing which is not so easy. The signal reflects back off the ends of the cable, the plugs and connected equipment (echoing back and forth). It produces ghost images of itself, which can fool the receiver into thinking that the ghost signals are the original signals. With short cables, under 1m, the ghost signals arrive close to the originals within the transition time frame from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 before the transition occurs. A 1m cable means the reflection arrives at about the same time as the transition is to be recorded. With longer cables, the reflection arrives too late to influence the receiver (The transition has already been recorded). Longer cables also mean lower amplitude or signal reflection; thus receiver can more easily determine between the correct signal and the spurious reflections. The bottom line is that a longer cable eliminates the false readings from the ghost images and thus reduces timing errors, called jitter, and therefore sounds better. Measurements and experimentation have determined the optimum size to be 1.5m or more. Very detailed explanation- for the curious, accompanies the diagram in the photos. Why SPDIF cables should be 1.5m long, detailed explanation. When the SPDIF signal is launched into the cable from the Transport, it is essentially a voltage square wave, consisting of rising and falling edges. These edges are no more than voltage transitions from about –250mV to +250mV, the rising edge transitioning from minus voltage to plus voltage and the falling edge transitioning from plus voltage to minus voltage. When an edge transitions, it can be described as having a rise-time or fall-time. This is the time it takes for the signal to transition from 10% to 90% of the entire voltage swing. (Note that this DOES Not happen instantaneously). The rise-time is important because this is what causes reflections on the transmission line. If the rise-time were very, very slow, say 50 nanoseconds, then there would be no reflections on the transmission line unless it was extremely long. Alternately, if the rise-time were less than one nanosecond, reflections would occur at every boundary, such as the connection from the circuit board to the wires that go to the connector. Typical stock Transports have around 25 nanosecond rise times. The primary concern for the manufacturer is to pass FCC regulations for emissions and electromagnetic interference and make the interface reliable. When the regulatory testing is done, they attach inexpensive, inferior cables and measure the emissions. To ensure that the manufacturer passes these tests, they take several precautions. One is designing in the slower than necessary 25 nanosecond rise-time. Another is inserting various filters in the Transport to eliminate high frequencies from the signal. As a result of these choices, there is a hazard created in using too short a digital cable. It is a result of the slow rise-time. When a transition is launched into the cable, it takes a period of time to propagate or transit to the other end. This propagation time is somewhat slower than the speed of light, usually around two nanoseconds per foot, but can be longer depending on the dielectrics used in the digital cable. When the transition reaches the end of the transmission line (in the DAC), a reflection can occur that propagates back to the driver in the Transport. Small reflections can occur in even well-matched systems. When the reflection reaches the driver, it can again be reflected back towards the DAC. This ping-pong effect can sustain itself for several bounces depending on the losses in the cable. It is not unusual to see 3-5 of these reflections before they finally decay away, mainly when using the best digital cables, which are usually low-loss. So, how does this affect the jitter? When the first reflection returns to the DAC, if the transition already in process at the receiver has not been completed, the reflection voltage will superimpose itself on the transition voltage, causing the transition to shift in time. The DAC will sample the transition in this time-shifted state, and there you have jitter. Lets look at a numerical example: If the rise-time is 25 nanoseconds and the cable length is 3 feet, then the propagation time is about 6 nanoseconds. Once the transition has arrived at the receiver, the reflection propagates back to the driver (6 nanoseconds), and then the driver reflects this back to the receiver (6 nanoseconds) = 12 nanoseconds. So, as seen at the receiver, 12 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started, we have a reflection superimposing on the transition. This is right about the time that the receiver will try to sample the transition, right around 0 volts DC. Not good. Now, if the cable had been 1.5 meters, the reflection would have arrived 18 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started at the receiver. This is much better because the receiver has likely already sampled the transition by this time.Unfortunately, better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

Digital Coaxial Audio Cable 1m SPDIF 75 Ohms RCA-RCA Quad Shield PCC-OFC IXOS

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:33 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 23.24 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 145096906127
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1023|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 2,0 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    Superb quality quadruple shielded digital coaxial SPDIF cable Ultra pure PCC copper conductors and screen This is my last cable. Use to connect your CD player or Blu Ray player to DAC OFC PCC copper core Gas injected dielectric to reduce dielectric constantTwo OFC copper braids and Two mylar foil shields for ultimate noise ejection and lowest shield impedance. The cable is factory terminated.In testing this performs above the QED Performance P75 digital cable (that I sell for £23-35) Orange labelled for digital cable Background Q: Why do digital cables make a difference – isn’t digital “perfect sound forever”?A: Because years ago the designers of the audio digital interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real time, rather than perfectly but late! Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US, how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The key difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTION In the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is sent in packets and assembled by the receiving machine, in the event of an error there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real time so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they effect the sound. Why In real time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface applied not only for CD players but also DVD, Blu Ray, Streamers etc. not just audio then. How do better cables help?JitterThe phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths or wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses or light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory this should be perfect, however in practice this square wave is rarely square - instead it has rounded edges. The rounder they are the more timing errors are introduced called jitter. (How the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is, if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition, but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition to this, as the signal hits the end of the cable it is partially reflected back overlaying an out of phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. InterferenceFinally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and effect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding and in some cases, for some particular equipment the use of Ferrite beads can help. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable the squarer the wave, the less reflection, the less spurious signals from interference. Unfortunately, that does mean that better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people that decided on the digital interface’s decades ago for no separating audio only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

QED DAV Professional Digital SPDIF 75 Ohms Coaxial Audio Cable 2m RCA-RCA New

Ende: 05.06. 2023 12:23:32 am Montag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 38.68 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 134577842873
  • Verkäufer: audio-maniacs (1019|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Hove, East Sussex Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 3,4 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    QED DAV FLX1 solid core oxygen free copper cable 75 Ohms SPDIF with 75 Ohm RCA plug, gold plated contacts. Use to connect your CD player, streamer, or Blu-Ray player to DAC. This is a bargain priced high-quality SPDIF RCA to RCA cable, and can be made in any length. (up to a recommended maximum of 5m). This cable is unusual in that most RCAs plugs are not 75 Ohm, so no matter how good the cable, the plugs will cause reflections of the high frequency digital signal and cause increased risk of timing errors (jitter). These plugs designed originally for 75 Ohm use in component video and RF applications are a perfect fit for the QED cable and ironically perform better than any of the QED plugs on this cable. Background Q: Why do digital cables make a difference – isnt digital perfect sound forever?A: Because years ago, the designers of the digital audio interfaces decided that the audio signals should be sent imperfectly in real-time, rather than perfectly but late!Our day-to-day experiences of sending digital signals are that they arrive perfectly, so what is different about audio? I dont get errors when I save my Word document to my hard drive or send an email to my cousin in the US; how is it so hard to send a signal 1m between two hi-fi components?The critical difference between Hi-Fi and digital documents being sent is that the audio signals are sent IN REAL TIME WITH NO BUFFERING OR ERROR CORRECTIONIn the case of a document sent across the word or to the printer, the data is transmitted in packets and assembled by the receiving machine; in the event of an error, there is time to ask for the signal to be re-sent it, is error corrected, so the result is 100% perfect. This all takes time. The audio signal has no time for any of this. It is sent as a continuous stream (Hence the phrase Streamer) in real-time, so there is no time to process it. If there are errors, then they affect the sound. Why In real-time? - this was decided years ago in the audio industry to allow video and sound to be synchronised - otherwise, lip-sync issues will be caused when playing a DVD or watching TV.The SPDIF interface is applied not only for CD players but also for DVD, Blu-Ray, Streamers etc., not just audio. How do better cables help? Jitter The phrase digital cables is a misnomer. All cables are lengths of wire or glass fibre, through which ANALOGUE voltages or pulses of light are sent. In the case of a wire, the analogue signal is a so-called square wave representing the 1s and 0s of the digital signal. In theory, this should be perfect; however, in practice, this square wave is rarely square - instead, it has rounded edges. The rounder they are, the more timing errors are introduced, called jitter. (How does the receiving machine know where the transition from 1 to 0 is if the edge of the wave is not a sharp vertical transition but a curve or angled line?) ReflectionsIn addition, as the signal hits the end of the cable, it is partially reflected, overlaying an out-of-phase rounded square wave on top of the original signal. This again contributes to errors. Longer cables reduce this issue; short cables are not a good idea. Interference Finally, Radio Frequency interference and Electromagnetic Interference can also introduce errors in the signal and affect the receiving equipment. This emphasises the need for good shielding; in some cases, using Ferrite beads can help with some special equipment. (They can also hinder if incorrectly specified). The better the cable, the squarer the wave, the less reflection, and the less spurious signals from interference. Length of cable – why 1.5m? Summary There are only two occasions in audio where a longer cable – or an optimum length cable is better than a short one. Digital cables have an optimum length of 1.5m or more. (The other occasion is for MM phono cartridges, which need a specific capacitance). The reason for this requires an explanation. Please refer to the diagram in the photos. The signal travelling down a SPDIF (so-called digital cable) is actually a square wave ANALOGUE voltage signal; however, in reality, this square does not have instantaneous changes - the squares are sloped and somewhat rounded off, too, as it takes some time to change state from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0. The accuracy of the pulses at the end of the cable determines how accurately the source can interpret the signal in value 1 or 0 and also timing which is not so easy. The signal reflects back off the ends of the cable, the plugs and connected equipment (echoing back and forth). It produces ghost images of itself, which can fool the receiver into thinking that the ghost signals are the original signals. With short cables, under 1m, the ghost signals arrive close to the originals within the transition time frame from 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 before the transition occurs. A 1m cable means the reflection arrives at about the same time as the transition is to be recorded. With longer cables, the reflection arrives too late to influence the receiver (The transition has already been recorded). Longer cables also mean lower amplitude or signal reflection; thus receiver can more easily determine between the correct signal and the spurious reflections. The bottom line is that a longer cable eliminates the false readings from the ghost images and thus reduces timing errors, called jitter, and therefore sounds better. Measurements and experimentation have determined the optimum size to be 1.5m or more. Very detailed explanation- for the curious, accompanies the diagram in the photos. Why SPDIF cables should be 1.5m long, detailed explanation. When the SPDIF signal is launched into the cable from the Transport, it is essentially a voltage square wave, consisting of rising and falling edges. These edges are no more than voltage transitions from about –250mV to +250mV, the rising edge transitioning from minus voltage to plus voltage and the falling edge transitioning from plus voltage to minus voltage. When an edge transitions, it can be described as having a rise-time or fall-time. This is the time it takes for the signal to transition from 10% to 90% of the entire voltage swing. (Note that this DOES Not happen instantaneously). The rise-time is important because this is what causes reflections on the transmission line. If the rise-time were very, very slow, say 50 nanoseconds, then there would be no reflections on the transmission line unless it was extremely long. Alternately, if the rise-time were less than one nanosecond, reflections would occur at every boundary, such as the connection from the circuit board to the wires that go to the connector. Typical stock Transports have around 25 nanosecond rise times. The primary concern for the manufacturer is to pass FCC regulations for emissions and electromagnetic interference and make the interface reliable. When the regulatory testing is done, they attach inexpensive, inferior cables and measure the emissions. To ensure that the manufacturer passes these tests, they take several precautions. One is designing in the slower than necessary 25 nanosecond rise-time. Another is inserting various filters in the Transport to eliminate high frequencies from the signal. As a result of these choices, there is a hazard created in using too short a digital cable. It is a result of the slow rise-time. When a transition is launched into the cable, it takes a period of time to propagate or transit to the other end. This propagation time is somewhat slower than the speed of light, usually around two nanoseconds per foot, but can be longer depending on the dielectrics used in the digital cable. When the transition reaches the end of the transmission line (in the DAC), a reflection can occur that propagates back to the driver in the Transport. Small reflections can occur in even well-matched systems. When the reflection reaches the driver, it can again be reflected back towards the DAC. This ping-pong effect can sustain itself for several bounces depending on the losses in the cable. It is not unusual to see 3-5 of these reflections before they finally decay away, mainly when using the best digital cables, which are usually low-loss. So, how does this affect the jitter? When the first reflection returns to the DAC, if the transition already in process at the receiver has not been completed, the reflection voltage will superimpose itself on the transition voltage, causing the transition to shift in time. The DAC will sample the transition in this time-shifted state, and there you have jitter. Lets look at a numerical example: If the rise-time is 25 nanoseconds and the cable length is 3 feet, then the propagation time is about 6 nanoseconds. Once the transition has arrived at the receiver, the reflection propagates back to the driver (6 nanoseconds), and then the driver reflects this back to the receiver (6 nanoseconds) = 12 nanoseconds. So, as seen at the receiver, 12 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started, we have a reflection superimposing on the transition. This is right about the time that the receiver will try to sample the transition, right around 0 volts DC. Not good. Now, if the cable had been 1.5 meters, the reflection would have arrived 18 nanoseconds after the 25 nanosecond transition started at the receiver. This is much better because the receiver has likely already sampled the transition by this time.Unfortunately, better (usually more expensive) cables produce better digital sound. Blame the people who decided on the digital interface decades ago for not separating audio-only from the need to send audio with moving pictures.

ELTAX DIGITAL LINE 3-WAY SPEAKERS 80 WATT 8 OHMS Superb condition with grills

Ende: 04.06. 2023 18:42:04 am Sonntag
  • Zustand: Gebraucht
  • Preis: 16.29 EUR Auktion
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 394649323075
  • Anzahl Gebote: 0
  • Verkäufer: alaholmes-brow0 (84|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: Shrewsbury Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 6,85 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    ELTAX (Danish) DIGITAL LINE 3-WAY SPEAKERS 80 WATT 8 OHMS Superb condition with grills. These are in immaculate condition and am only selling as have just upgraded to some 2nd hand Wharfedale Diamonds. They were great in my study (4m x 3M) Size is 35cm H x 20cm W x 25cmD Listed and then noticed in the picture one corner peg for grill broken off. Does not affect use and still in amazing condition otherwise

Newest Tools Voltmeter Gauge Battery LED Digital 18g 20 Cm / 7.87 In > 100K Ohms

Ende: 27.05. 2023 10:14:07 am Samstag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 3.2 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 404275898744
  • Verkäufer: shoppingfromeast (133977|98.7%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Gewerblich
  • Ort: suzhou China
  • Versand nach: Worldwide
  • Versandkosten: 0,0 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    Newest Tools Voltmeter Gauge Battery LED Digital 18g 20 Cm / 7.87 In > 100K OhmsDESCRIPTION Specifications: * brand new and high quality *Measuring range: Red DC4.50-30.0V, green DC4.70-30.0V, blue DC5.00-30.0V *Power supply range: *No additional power supply, directly use of the measured voltage as a power supply, the range as above *The highest input DC30.0V. Note: The input voltage higher than 30V may be permanently damaged! Allowable error ± 1%; greater than or equal to 10V, the error is ± 0.3V; less than 10V error ± 0.10. *Input impedance : > 100K ohms *Operating current: Red < 23mA, green < 18mA, blue < 13mA *Refresh speed: about 300mS time *Display mode: three 0.56 LED digital tube *Display color: red, green, blue optional *Lead length: about 20 cm / 7.87 in *Dimensions: about 48 x 29 x 22 mm / 1.89 x 1.14 x 0.87 in *Opening size: about 46 x 27 mm / 1.81 x 1.07 in *Net weight: about 18g *Operating temperature: -20 ? ~ 65 ? Package Contents: 1*Voltmeter Note: 1.The real color of the item may be slightly different from the pictures shown on website caused by many factors such as brightness of your monitor and light brightness. 2.Please allow slight manual measurement deviation for the data. POLICESShippingPaymentWARRANTY We only ship to confirmed Paypal addresses. Please comfirm that your paypal address is in line with your shipping address. Please kindly note that the combined shipping is not provided because the shipping fee is calculated by weight. Also, the each additional item means exactly the the same color and size. It takes about 7-15 working days to UK; about 10-30 working days to other countries. Transit time may be a little delayed because of the bad weather and customs inspection. If you do not receive your item within 30 working days since payment finished, please contact us immediately for further assistance. We accept payment via Paypal only. Payment must be completed within 5 days. If you have any problems about payment, please contact us via ebay message. We strive for 100% customer satisfaction! Positive Feedback is very important to us. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us via Ask seller a question . We will reply your email within 24 working hours.

câble digital wireworld 110 ohms XLR

Ende: 27.05. 2023 07:39:21 am Samstag
  • Zustand: Gebraucht
  • Preis: 59.0 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 225592780382
  • Verkäufer: cebonbernard (204|100.0%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Privat
  • Ort: SAINT QUENTIN Frankreich
  • Versand nach: FR
  • Versandkosten: 4,0 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    suite montée en gamme , cet excellent câble digital wireworld 110 ohms , en très bon état , connectique XLR., référence starlight 7 , longueur 1 mètre , en cuivre occ et ofc , le câble est bien rodé , ( son prix neuf avoisinait les 200 euros ) ! prix : 59 euros

*Read Desc* Apart Revamp 2250 2-Channel Digital Power Amp 2x250 @ 4 Ohms

Ende: 26.05. 2023 11:37:11 am Freitag
  • Zustand: Als Ersatzteil / Defekt
  • Preis: 54.41 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 166123348174
  • Verkäufer: ccbrightonlr (5601|99.9%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Gewerblich
  • Ort: Brighton Großbritannien
  • Versand nach: GB
  • Versandkosten: 20,2 EUR
  • bei ebay
  • Beschreibung

    FREE NEXT DAY SHIPPING WITHIN THE UK* *Read Desc* Apart Revamp 2250 2-Channel Digital Power Amp 2x250 @ 4 Ohms *****PLEASE READ DESCRIPTION & VIEW ALL PHOTOS CAREFULLY***** Condition Description: Sold for parts as this unit doesnt turn on. Very good overall cosmetic condition. Amplifier only. 2 channels. Class D. 2x250w @ 4 ohms. 500w @ 8 ohms. Fanless. 1U. As the photos show, the item has only light signs of cosmetic wear. For a used unit of this type, it is in really good condition. Device has passed a PAT test and is electronically safe to use, something many sellers cannot guarantee on eBay. Sold exactly as pictured - amplifier only - no box, manuals or cables included. This amp will be posted by DPD in VERY SOLID packaging with free next day delivery. Please feel free to ask any questions. *FREE NEXT DAY SHIPPING WITHIN THE UK Orders placed by 1pm Monday to Friday will be dispatched within one business day using a 24 hour service and delivered the next working day (some addresses outside the UK Mainland may take a second or third day depending on the location). We always aim to dispatch before 2pm on the same working day if we can but we cant guarantee it, so please let us know if your delivery is urgent and well see what we can do. For the rest of our listings, please click here

Voltmeter Gauge Battery > 100K Ohms DC Gauge Battery Green LED Digital

Ende: 26.05. 2023 04:58:00 am Freitag
  • Zustand: Neu
  • Preis: 2.99 EUR FESTPREIS
  • Status: nicht verkauft
  • Artikelnummer: 125918018658
  • Verkäufer: angelhoodseason (7383|98.7%)
  • Verkäufertyp: Gewerblich
  • Ort: suzhou China
  • Versand nach: Worldwide
  • Versandkosten: 1,02 EUR
  • bei ebay